But it's the 1960s and despite the fact that she is a scientist, her peers are very unscientific when it comes to equality. In fact Elizabeth Zott would be the first to point out that there is no such thing as an average woman. Elizabeth Zott is not your average woman. "Set in 1960s California, this blockbuster debut is the hilarious, idiosyncratic and uplifting story of a female scientist whose career is constantly derailed by the idea that a woman's place is in the home, only to find herself starring as the host of America's most beloved TV cooking show. Before long, Gibson is locked in a battle of wits with a brilliant woman with no name, a hidden past, and unknown motives-whose end game is as mysterious as it is deadly. In the blink of an eye, Gibson has become a prime suspect in a murder investigation-and now her job is also on the line until she proves that she was set up. What's more, no one named Arlene Robinson works at ProEye. Not only does the arms dealer not exist but the murder victim turns out to be Harry Langhorne, a man with mob ties who used to be in Witness Protection. That is, until she arrives at the mansion to discover a dead body in a secret room-and that nothing is as it seems. ![]() When Mickey gets a call from a colleague named Arlene Robinson, she thinks nothing of Arlene's unusual request for her to go inventory the vacant home of an arms dealer who cheated ProEye's clients and fled. FilmMagic James Patterson said not making the New York Times list upon release hurts an author’s chance at better sales and publicity.Mickey Gibson, single mother and former detective, leads a hectic life: juggling the demands of her two small children with the tasks of her job working remotely for ProEye, a global investigation company that hunts down wealthy tax and credit cheats. James Patterson accused the Times of “cooking the books” on the best-selling list, claiming he outsold three of the books on the list of 15. “And are always reviewing our methods in compiling the Best-Seller Lists to ensure that we are best serving our readers,” the Times spokesperson said. The Times told Outkick that it responded to Patterson’s concerns by letting him know the publication takes them “seriously.” And it simply doesn’t,” he said about the Times purported rationale in his letter. ![]() “Here you suggest your process has statistical rigor. fr5NfX7uME- James Patterson March 29, 2023 They told my publisher they didn’t rely on just “raw” sales. I recently wrote a letter about them cooking the books on their best seller lists. Patterson told Fox News on Sunday that not making the New York Times list upon release hurts an author’s chance at better sales and publicity. “I guess that means you favor the cooked variety.” “I understand you responded to a recent query from my publisher regarding a book containing what I believe to be important and illuminating firsthand stories by American police – by saying that you don’t just pay attention to ‘raw’ sales,” he wrote in a statement posted to Twitter Wednesday. ![]() He accused the Times of “cooking the books” on its esteemed best-selling list. Patterson, 76, said his new book “Walk the Blue Line: No Right, No Left – Just cops telling their true stories to James Patterson” initially failed to make the list even though he said it outsold all but three of the books on the list of 15, according to BookScan, which compiles book sales data. Renowned author James Patterson has ripped the New York Times in a fiery open letter over its “lack of journalistic rigor” regarding its Best Sellers list - after the closely-watched list snubbed his highly-reviewed novel about law enforcement in America. One woman’s memoir of cycling around the world Publisher drops children’s illustrator for posting anti-trans notes in public How one of North America’s most daring criminals was finally caughtĪdoption rights activist recalls crusade to access birth records
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |